The outcomes of home treatment for schizophrenia

  • Huang H
  • Taylor M
  • Carmichael A
7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. Aims and method We examined whether intensive home treatment (IHTT) was beneficial for acute schizophrenia, using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale as a measure of severity and change, between 2011-2015. Demographic and clinical details were collected. Results 309 cases were referred to IHTT, comprising 245 separate individuals. This represented all severe acute psychotic episodes in Edinburgh during the study period. Three quarters of individuals had an improvement in CGI following IHTT and were safely managed at home. Thirty-nine per cent of all people received three or more regular medications. Comorbid drug and alcohol misuse was also frequently seen. Clinical implications IHTT can be beneficial to those suffering an acute episode of psychosis and has been shown to improve overall clinical outcome based on the CGI. Medication polypharmacy, as well as drug and alcohol use, are commonly seen in this population. Declaration of interest M.T. worked in IHTT at the time of the study, and has received fees and/or hospitality from Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka in the past 3 years.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, H. C. H., Taylor, M., & Carmichael, A. (2018). The outcomes of home treatment for schizophrenia. BJPsych Bulletin, 42(6), 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.56

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 3

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

54%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

23%

Social Sciences 2

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0