Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When responding to stimuli, response and stimulus features are thought to be integrated into a short episodic memory trace, an event file. Repeating any of its components causes retrieval of the whole event file leading to benefits for full repetitions and changes but interference for partial repetitions. These binding effects are especially pronounced if attention is allocated to certain features. We used attentional biases caused by spider stimuli, aiming tomodulate the impact of attention on retrieval. Participants discriminated the orientation of bars repeating or changing their location in prime-probe sequences. Crucially, shortly before probe target onset, an image of a spider and that of a cub appeared at one position each one of which was spatially congruent with the following probe target. Participants were faster when responding to targets spatially congruent with a preceding spider, suggesting an attentional bias toward aversive information. Yet, neither overall binding effects differed between content of preceding spatially congruent images nor did this effect emerge when taking individual fear of spiders into account. We conclude that attentional biases toward spiders modulate overall behavior, but that this has no impact on retrieval.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schöpper, L. M., Küpper, V., & Frings, C. (2023). Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000584

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free