Integrative tumour mutation burden with CD39 and PD-L1 for the prediction of response to PD-L1 blockade and adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: CD39, a rate-limiting enzyme to convert extracellular ATP (eATP) to adenosine, has been reported to be a key modulator of immune response, but its correlation with therapeutic sensitivity remains obscure. We conducted this study to determine whether the integration of CD39 and traditional biomarkers could improve the prediction of responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 760 patients from IMvigor210 trial, TCGA database and Zhongshan Hospital in this study. We constructed the CPT scoring system based on CD39, PD-L1 and tumour mutation burden (TMB) and validated its efficacy in predicting therapeutic responsiveness in MIBC patients. Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess clinical outcomes of patients. Results: The CPT scoring system could predict the response to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. The CPT score was positively correlated with APOBEC mutational signature and SNV neoantigens enrichment, antigen presentation, and TCR signalling. High CPT score also indicated the inflamed immune phenotype and basal/squamous molecular subtype. Conclusions: CD39 expression is closely correlated with the immunogenic contexture of MIBC. Integrating CD39 with PD-L1 and TMB could stratify the sensitivity of patients with MIBC to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, C., Liu, Z., Jin, K., Zeng, H., Shao, F., Chang, Y., … Zhang, W. (2022). Integrative tumour mutation burden with CD39 and PD-L1 for the prediction of response to PD-L1 blockade and adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 127(9), 1718–1725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01943-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free