Social Geography II: Islamophobia, transphobia, and sizism

16Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Different forms of discrimination, marginalisation and exclusion have been central concerns for social geography for over 50 years now. Some forms of prejudice are historically resistant, long-lasting and have featured in social geography for many decades (such as racism and sexism); others have emerged more recently within social geography debates as well as in the wider society and are less well understood. In this second progress report on social geography, I explore recent research about Islamophobia, transphobia and sizism that demonstrates that each of these forms of prejudice is worthy of further study and analysis in their own right by social geographers and scholars in related fields. I argue that it would be productive to investigate areas of connection and solidarity across and within these different prejudices and others in order to be able to resist multiple forms of discrimination, intolerance and hate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hopkins, P. (2020). Social Geography II: Islamophobia, transphobia, and sizism. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519833472

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free