Collective intentionality and the state theory of money

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The circulation of non-convertible currency and the source of its value raise important ontological questions that touch upon the conditions of its acceptance. The aim of this paper is to address such questions by illustrating how collective intentionality and constitutive declarations can be employed in order to develop an adequate ontological framework for explaining the emergence and the persistence of the current monetary standard. This analysis of money differs from that of mainstream commodity theory in that it argues against individualism, which traditionally underwrites both economic and philosophical analyses of money. The resulting ontology is based on an account of collective intentionality developed upon the "sharedness" of individual intentional states; this account supports the state theory of money, combining it with an ontological analysis of the state and its authority.

References Powered by Scopus

Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization

1911Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What are institutions?

1434Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On money as a medium of exchange

669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On money as a conventional sign: Revisiting Aristotle's conception of money

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Nature of the Economy: Aristotelian Essays on the Philosophy and Epistemology of Economics

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What economics can learn from ontology: Toward an interdisciplinary reconciliation

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadopoulos, G. (2015). Collective intentionality and the state theory of money. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 8(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v8i2.198

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Computer Science 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free