The COVID-19 pandemic and the internationalization of production: A review of the literature

19Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Motivation: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially altered the context for cross-border business. This is reflected in trade flows but the conditions for conducting dispersed production functions across countries are also affected. This “new normal” period presents the need to examine the main problems and challenges in international trade and business. Purpose: The article aims to establish the scope, aspects, and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on international trade and on international production by reviewing recent articles which deal with international trade and global value chain (GVC) issues, encompassing both changes that were already taking place and the challenges that began in 2020. Methods and approach: The findings of recent articles on trade flows and changes in GVCs (mainly the period 2019–2021) are described in theoretical terms, compared, and systematically reviewed. Special focus is given to the impact of the pandemic on GVCs, renationalization, and GVCs and the impact of the pandemic on GVC governance, and GVCs in the production of vaccines for the COVID-19 virus. Findings: A drop in trade was recorded in 2020, alongside the introduction of protective trade policy measures. Reduced GVC activities had a negative impact on welfare and the “renationalization” of GVC-related activities is not a real solution. For the development of GVCs it is important to find a trade-off between efficiency and resilience, starting with reorganization (re-engineering) of GVCs, and probably focusing on regional frameworks. Liberal trade policies are essential to ensure the involvement of GVCs in producing the COVID-19 vaccines, since the various inputs are produced in different countries. Policy implications: The possible directions for the future development of GVCs are elaborated: reshoring, resilience in supply chains, adjustments in governance, diversification, and development of risk-management strategies. The process of internationalization is not in question, but presents challenges which create the need for adjustments in its future development. Current problems with vaccine production arise in part from the erection of trade barriers and rising nationalism. There is a need for greater cross-country co-operation to avoid placing national short-term interests before long-term and broader objectives.

References Powered by Scopus

Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines

4190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice

635Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The digitalization of retailing: an exploratory framework

442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How China's digital technology development affects the environmental costs related to global value chains? Evidence from regional manufacturing sectors

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A decisional framework for manufacturing relocation: Consolidating and expanding the reshoring debate

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International trade resilience with applied welfare economics: an analysis on personal protective equipment

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kersan-Škabić, I. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and the internationalization of production: A review of the literature. Development Policy Review, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

63%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Researcher 5

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 13

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 13

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7

18%

Engineering 6

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free