The feasibility of a diplomatic solution to the confrontation over Iran's nuclear program

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Iran and the United Nations Security Council have been in an escalating confrontation over Iran's enrichment program since 2006. The Security Council has been demanding that Iran suspend its enrichment while Iran has been demanding that the Security Council recognize Iran's right to enrich. As a result of the impasse, the Security Council and the West have been increasing sanctions on Iran while Iran has been expanding its enrichment program and increasing the enrichment of its product. It is proposed that, as a compromise, the UN Security Council accept an Iranian enrichment program in exchange for maximal transparency (Additional Protocol plus) and constraints including limits on: enrichment capacity, enrichment level to less than 5 %, and stockpiles of enriched UF6. In addition, Iran would agree not to reprocess spent fuel, i.e. separate plutonium, and to export all of its spent fuel. It is pointed out that, in 2005, Iran offered to accept essentially all of these transparency requirements and constraints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Von Hippel, F. N. (2013). The feasibility of a diplomatic solution to the confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program. In Assessment of the Nuclear Programs of Iran and North Korea (Vol. 9789400760196, pp. 67–76). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6019-6_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free