Advice complexity and barely random algorithms

12Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recently, a new measurement - the advice complexity - was introduced for measuring the information content of online problems. The aim is to measure the bitwise information that online algorithms lack, causing them to perform worse than offline algorithms. Among a large number of problems, a well-known scheduling problem, job shop scheduling with unit length tasks, and the paging problem were analyzed within this model. We observe some connections between advice complexity and randomization. Our special focus goes to barely random algorithms, i.e., randomized algorithms that use only a constant number of random bits, regardless of the input size. We adapt the results on advice complexity to obtain efficient barely random algorithms for both the job shop scheduling and the paging problem. Furthermore, so far, it has not been investigated for job shop scheduling how good an online algorithm may perform when only using a very small (e.g., constant) number of advice bits. In this paper, we answer this question by giving both lower and upper bounds, and also improve the best known upper bound for optimal algorithms. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Komm, D., & Královič, R. (2011). Advice complexity and barely random algorithms. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6543 LNCS, pp. 332–343). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18381-2_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free