Effect of using automated auditing tools on detecting compliance failures in unmanaged processes

12Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The effect of using automated auditing tools to detect compliance failures in unmanaged business processes is investigated. In the absence of a process execution engine, compliance of an unmanaged business process is tracked by using an auditing tool developed based on business provenance technology or employing auditors. Since budget constraints limit employing auditors to evaluate all process instances, a methodology is devised to use both expert opinion on a limited set of process instances and the results produced by fallible automated audit machines on all process instances. An improvement factor is defined based on the average number of non-compliant process instances detected and it is shown that the improvement depends on the prevalence of non-compliance in the process as well as the sensitivity and the specificity of the audit machine. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg BPM Governance and Compliance*Management Issues and Empirical Studies*Non-traditional BPM Scenarios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doganata, Y., & Curbera, F. (2009). Effect of using automated auditing tools on detecting compliance failures in unmanaged processes. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5701 LNCS, pp. 310–326). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free