Comparison of widefield/deconvolution and confocal microscopy for three-dimensional imaging

65Citations
Citations of this article
258Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The biggest limitation inherent in optical microscopy is its lateral spatial resolution, which is determined by the wavelength of the light used and the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens. Another important limitation is the resolution in the direction of the optical axis, conventionally called z, which is related to the depth of field. The presence of a finite aperture gives rise to undesirable and rather complicated characteristics in the image. In essence, the depth of field depends on the size of structure or spatial frequency being imaged. © 2006, 1995, 1989 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shaw, P. J. (2006). Comparison of widefield/deconvolution and confocal microscopy for three-dimensional imaging. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy: Third Edition (pp. 453–467). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45524-2_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free