Reconciling Safety and Fairness in Global Agri-Food Standardization

  • Amekawa Y
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Private food safety standards have recently emerged as a dynamic power in the global value chan. Good agricultural practices (GAP) is one such standard currently gaining popularity as a prominent field-level food quality assurance system. Achieving private GAP certification, most notably of GlobalGAP, is a dif ficult option for low income producers in the Global South due to the high costs required for necessary investments and certification. This paper critically analyzes the ethical implications of private food safety standards in light of three theoretical perspectives from environmental sociology: ecological moderniza tion, risk society, and eco-socialism. It then examines the potential of public GAP schemes currently emerging in the Global South for reconciling safety and fairness in global agri-food standardization. It is suggested that the expansion of producer participation in public GAP program be regulated by gradual improvements in the state capacity of resource mobilization for auditing and extension institutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amekawa, Y. (2013). Reconciling Safety and Fairness in Global Agri-Food Standardization. Sociology Mind, 03(01), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2013.31006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free