Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial

48Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without a cardiac output goal directed therapy (GDT) algorithm. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled trial in four high volume hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery centres. We evaluated whether the additional impact of a intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm would influence the amount of fluid delivered, reduce fluid related complications, and improve length of hospital stay. Fifty-two consecutive adult patients were recruited. The median (IQR) duration of surgery was 8.6 hours (7.1:9.6) in the GDT group vs. 7.8 hours (6.8:9.0) in the usual care group (p = 0.2). Intraoperative fluid balance was 1005mL (475:1873) in the GDT group vs. 3300mL (2474:3874) in the usual care group (p<0.0001). Total volume of fluid administered intraoperatively was also lower in the GDT group: 2050mL (1313:2700) vs. 4088mL (3400:4525), p<0.0001 and vasoactive medications were used more frequently. There were no significant differences in proportions of patients experiencing overall complications (p = 0.179); however, fewer complications occurred in the GDT group: 44 vs. 92 (Incidence Rate Ratio: 0.41; 95%CI 0.24 to 0.69, p = 0.001). Median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 9.5 days (IQR: 7.0, 14.3) in the GDT vs. 12.5 days in the usual care group (IQR: 9.0, 22.3) for an Incidence Rate Ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.85, p = 0.002). In conclusion, using a surgery-specific, patient-specific goal directed restrictive fluid therapy algorithm in this cohort of patients, can justify using enough fluid without causing oedema, yet as little fluid as possible without causing hypovolaemia i.e. “precision” fluid therapy. Our findings support the use of a perioperative haemodynamic optimization plan that prioritizes preservation of cardiac output and organ perfusion pressure by judicious use of fluid therapy, rational use of vasoactive drugs and timely application of inotropic drugs. They also suggest the need for further larger studies to confirm its findings.

References Powered by Scopus

Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey

25737Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2013

11920Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

6493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hemodynamic goal-directed therapy and postoperative kidney injury: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weinberg, L., Ianno, D., Churilov, L., Chao, I., Scurrah, N., Rachbuch, C., … Nikfarjam, M. (2017). Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183313

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

54%

Researcher 11

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

17%

Sports and Recreations 2

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free