A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies

231Citations
Citations of this article
487Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This scientometric review of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from 2005 to 2018 (3639 studies; 3508 traits) reveals extraordinary increases in sample sizes, rates of discovery and traits studied. A longitudinal examination shows fluctuating ancestral diversity, still predominantly European Ancestry (88% in 2017) with 72% of discoveries from participants recruited from three countries (US, UK, Iceland). US agencies, primarily NIH, fund 85% and women are less often senior authors. We generate a unique GWAS H-Index and reveal a tight social network of prominent authors and frequently used data sets. We conclude with 10 evidence-based policy recommendations for scientists, research bodies, funders, and editors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, M. C., & Rahal, C. (2019, December 1). A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies. Communications Biology. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0261-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free