The Knowledge Graph Track at OAEI: Gold Standards, Baselines, and the Golden Hammer Bias

21Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) is an annual evaluation of ontology matching tools. In 2018, we have started the Knowledge Graph track, whose goal is to evaluate the simultaneous matching of entities and schemas of large-scale knowledge graphs. In this paper, we discuss the design of the track and two different strategies of gold standard creation. We analyze results and experiences obtained in first editions of the track, and, by revealing a hidden task, we show that all tools submitted to the track (and probably also to other tracks) suffer from a bias which we name the golden hammer bias.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hertling, S., & Paulheim, H. (2020). The Knowledge Graph Track at OAEI: Gold Standards, Baselines, and the Golden Hammer Bias. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12123 LNCS, pp. 343–359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free