Principal stratification and attribution prohibition: Good ideas taken too far

35Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pearl's article provides a useful springboard for discussing further the benefits and drawbacks of principal stratification and the associated discomfort with attributing effects to post-treatment variables. The basic insights of the approach are important: pay close attention to modification of treatment effects by variables not observable before treatment decisions are made, and be careful in attributing effects to variables when counterfactuals are ill-defined. These insights have often been taken too far in many areas of application of the approach, including instrumental variables, censoring by death, and surrogate outcomes. A novel finding is that the usual principal stratification estimand in the setting of censoring by death is by itself of little practical value in estimating intervention effects. © 2011 Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joffe, M. (2011). Principal stratification and attribution prohibition: Good ideas taken too far. International Journal of Biostatistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free