Argumentation: A calculus for Human-Centric AI

19Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper aims to expose and analyze the potential foundational role of Argumentation for Human-Centric AI, and to present the main challenges for this foundational role to be realized in a way that will fit well with the wider requirements and challenges of Human-Centric AI. The central idea set forward is that by endowing machines with the ability to argue with forms of machine argumentation that are cognitively compatible with those of human argumentation, we will be able to support a naturally effective, enhancing and ethical human-machine cooperation and “social” integration.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Explainable Machine Learning via Argumentation

3Citations
4Readers
Get full text

ArgMed-Agents: Explainable Clinical Decision Reasoning with LLM Disscusion via Argumentation Schemes

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dietz, E., Kakas, A., & Michael, L. (2022). Argumentation: A calculus for Human-Centric AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.955579

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

40%

Philosophy 1

20%

Design 1

20%

Mathematics 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free