Antibacterial efficacy of pastes against e faecalis in primary root dentin: A confocal microscope study

11Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. Management of abscessed primary teeth often present endodontic failure owing to questioned efficiency of dressings or obturating pastes to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis, a resistant bacterium, residing in depth of dentinal tubules. The present study evaluates the antimicrobial efficacy of two antibacterial and two obturating pastes in dentinal tubules of primary teeth infected with Enterococcus faecalis using viability stain and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Study design. Total 28 samples were prepared. Four groups with 6 samples each were made according to antibacterial pastes i.e. 1%or 2%Chlorhexidine (CHX)+calcium hydroxide (CH), CH+iodoform (Metapex) and Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE). Dentinal tubules from the root canal side were infected with E. faecalis by centrifugation of the bacterial suspension. Two specimens from each group were subjected to 1, 7 and 15 days antibacterial pastes exposure. Viability staining followed by CLSM were used to quantitatively analyze the dead cell count directly inside dentin. Result: Univariate analysis showed that all medicaments were significantly effective (p ZOE(15)> Metapex(15)> 2%CHX+CH(15)> 2%CHX+CH(7)> 2%CHX+CH(1)> 1%CHX+CH(7)> 2%CHX+CH(15)> Metapex(1)> ZOE(1)> ZOE(7). Conclusions: All medicaments were effective against E. faecalis in dentine of primary teeth and their efficacy increased with longer contact with 1%CHX+CH being most effective at day 15. Inclusion of 1%CHX in dressings or obturating pastes might minimize the endodontic relapse and maximize the tooth retention in functional state in pediatric dentistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verma, R., Sharma, D. S., & Pathak, A. K. (2015). Antibacterial efficacy of pastes against e faecalis in primary root dentin: A confocal microscope study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 39(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.247

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free