Effect of maternal obesity on placental lipid metabolism

103Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Obese women, on average, give birth to babies with high fat mass. Placental lipid metabolism alters fetal lipid delivery, potentially moderating neonatal adiposity, yet how it is affected by maternal obesity is poorly understood. We hypothesized that fatty acid (FA) accumulation (esterification) is higher and FA b-oxidation (FAO) is lower in placentas from obese, compared with lean women. We assessed acylcarnitine profiles (lipid oxidation intermediates) in mother-baby-placenta triads, in addition to lipid content, and messenger RNA (mRNA)/protein expression of key regulators of FA metabolism pathways in placentas of lean and obese women with normal glucose tolerance recruited at scheduled term Cesarean delivery. In isolated trophoblasts,we measured [3H]-palmitate metabolism. Placentas of obese women had 17.5% (95% confidence interval: 6.1, 28.7%)more lipid than placentas of lean women, and higher mRNA and protein expression of FA esterification regulators (e.g., peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, steroyl-CoA desaturase 1, and diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase-1). [3H]-palmitate esterification rates were increased in trophoblasts from obese compared with lean women. Placentas of obese women had fewer mitochondria and a lower concentration of acylcarnitines, suggesting a decrease inmitochondrial FAOcapacity. Conversely, peroxisomal FAOwas greater in placentas of obesewomen. Altogether, these changes in placental lipid metabolismmay serve to limit the amount of maternal lipid transferred to the fetus, restraining excess fetal adiposity in this population of glucose-tolerant women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Calabuig-Navarro, V., Haghiac, M., Minium, J., Glazebrook, P., Ranasinghe, G. C., Hoppel, C., … O’Tierney-Ginn, P. (2017). Effect of maternal obesity on placental lipid metabolism. Endocrinology, 158(8), 2543–2555. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2017-00152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free