Measurement of cyclosporine by liquid chromatography and three immunoassays in blood from liver, cardiac, and renal transplant recipients

46Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In an effort to replace HPLC for whole-blood determination of cydosporine (CsA), we compared HPLC with radioimmunoassay (RIA; INCSTAR, Cydo-Trac SP assay), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA; Abbott TDx), and in-house modified enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT™ Syva Co.). For blood samples from 200 various transplant recipients, RIA = 1.262 (HPLC) - 8.16, r = 0.983; FPIA = 1.200 (HPLC) + 19.90, r = 0.981; and EMIT = 1.038 (HPLC) + 11.28, r = 0.985. For segregation by transplant type, RIA, FPIA, and EMIT demonstrated positive biases of 27%, 12%, and 3%, respectively, for liver transplant recipients (n = 50) when compared with HPLC. Heart transplant recipients (n = 50) gave positive bias values of 23%, 14%, and 4% for RIA, FPIA, and EMIT, respectively. Adult renal transplant recipients (n = 50) demonstrated positive bias values of 30%, 31%, and 0% for RIA, FPIA, and EMIT, respectively. For pediatric renal transplant recipients (n = 50), positive biases of 40%, 31 %, and 9% were obtained for RIA, FPIA, and EMIT, respectively. We conclude that the modified EMIT represents the best replacement for HPLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McBride, J. H., Kim, S. S., Rodgerson, D. O., Reyes, A. F., & Ota, M. K. (1992). Measurement of cyclosporine by liquid chromatography and three immunoassays in blood from liver, cardiac, and renal transplant recipients. Clinical Chemistry, 38(11), 2300–2306. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/38.11.2300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free