Conduction system pacing on track to replace CRT? Review of current evidence and prospects of conduction system pacing

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Conduction system pacing (CSP) has been emerging over the last decade as a pacing option instead of conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing. Numerous case reports, some observational studies and a few randomized control trials have looked at optimum pacing strategies for heart failure (HF) with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or cases where left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is anticipated due to chronic RV pacing (RVP). Evolution of pacing strategies from standard RVP to septal RVP, BiV pacing and now CSP have shown improving hemodynamic responses and possible ease of implantation of CSP systems. In this review article, we review the literature on the evolution of CSP and common scenarios where it might be beneficial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moustafa, A. T., Tang, A. S. L., & Khan, H. R. (2023). Conduction system pacing on track to replace CRT? Review of current evidence and prospects of conduction system pacing. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220709

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free