Effects of retinal eccentricity and acuity on global-motion processing

3Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study assessed direction discrimination with moving random-dot cinematograms at retinal eccentricities of 0, 8, 22, and 40 deg. In addition, Landolt-C acuity was assessed at these eccentricities to determine whether changes in motion discrimination performance covaried with acuity in the retinal periphery. The results of the experiment indicated that discrimination thresholds increased with retinal eccentricity and directional variance (noise), independent of acuity. Psychophysical modeling indicated that the results for eccentricity and noise could be explained by an increase in channel bandwidth and an increase in internal multiplicative noise. © 2012 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Human photoreceptor topography

2201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability

719Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception

562Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is theta burst stimulation applied to visual cortex able to modulate peripheral visual acuity?

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perspective cues make eye-specific contributions to 3-D motion perception

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Action Recognition in a Crowded Environment

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bower, J. D., Bian, Z., & Andersen, G. J. (2012). Effects of retinal eccentricity and acuity on global-motion processing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74(5), 942–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0283-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

52%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

17%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 12

50%

Neuroscience 5

21%

Engineering 4

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free