From Theory Choice to Theory Search: The Essential Tension Between Exploration and Exploitation in Science

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Early in his work Kuhn identifies a tension in science between conservativeness and innovation in theory development; that is, scientists face uncertainty in choosing between the exploitation of an existing theory or the creation of a new one. Kuhn suggests that theory choice should be based on heuristics involving common scientific virtues; however, he does not specify how those values could lead a decentralized group of scientists to collectively produce successful science. In this chapter, we introduce a model for how this process might take place. We shift the focus of rational theory choice from selecting the best among a given set of theories to finding a balance between selecting among given theories and searching for new ones. Here we show that the local interactions of rational scientists balancing the exploitation and exploration of theories results in a very robust pattern characterized by a succession of tradition-bound periods punctuated by non-cumulative breaks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Langhe, R., & Rubbens, P. (2015). From Theory Choice to Theory Search: The Essential Tension Between Exploration and Exploitation in Science. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 311, pp. 105–114). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13383-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free