Chronic pain

0Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This chapter focuses on describing the current converging evidence-base on what is a debilitating, common and costly condition worldwide. Historically, the prevailing understanding of chronic pain was based on a purely biomedical model; however, a plethora of research has now disconfirmed the tenets of this reductionistic model, and pain is now widely understood from a biopsychosocial perspective. Within this framework, a number of biological, psychological, and social risk and protective factors have been found to be of importance. This chapter describes these risks and protective factors, and provides an overview of the empirical findings pertaining to the links between these factors and short- and long-term pain-related outcomes. An approach based on the biopsychosocial model that targets pain from a multidimensional perspective is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT); the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this approach across a range of pain types is described, along with needed future directions. More research is needed to advance scientific understanding of the processes underlying the transition from acute to chronic pain, as well as those factors that mediate as well as moderate CBT and other treatment outcomes in order to enhance preventative as well as management interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Pain mechanisms: A new theory

8207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain

2017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain

1971Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Day, M. A. (2018). Chronic pain. In Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 369–380). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v35i2.1119

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

62%

Researcher 20

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 33

41%

Psychology 21

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free