The best argument against kidney sales fails

12Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simon Rippon has recently argued against kidney markets on the grounds that introducing the option to vend will result in many people, especially the poor, being subject to harmful pressure to vend. Though compelling, Rippon's argument fails. What he takes to be a single phenomenon-social and legal pressure to vend-is actually two. Only one of these forms of pressure is, by Rippon's own account, harmful. Further, an empirically informed view of the regulated market suggests that this harmful pressure is easily avoided. Thus, the harm that is the lynchpin of Rippon's opposition is neither a necessary feature of the market nor is it likely to play a significant role in its operation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Semrau, L. (2015). The best argument against kidney sales fails. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(6), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102390

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free