Evaluation of dried sweet sorghum stalks as raw material for methane production

23Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The potential of utilizing dried sweet sorghum stalks as raw material for anaerobic digestion has been evaluated. Two different treatments were tested, a mild thermal and an enzymatic, alone or in combination. Thermal pretreatment was found to decrease the methane yields, whereas one-step enzymatic treatment resulted in a significant increase of 15.1% comparing to the untreated sweet sorghum. Subsequently, in order to increase the total methane production, the combined effect of enzyme load and I/S on methane yields from sweet sorghum was evaluated by employing response surface methodology. The obtained model showed that the maximum methane yield that could be achieved is 296 mL CH4/g VS at I/S ratio of 0.35 with the addition of 11.12 FPU/g sweet sorghum.

References Powered by Scopus

Measurement of cellulase activities

5124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review

4068Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays

1597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Production of biofuels from sorghum

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethanol production from enzymatically treated dried food waste using enzymes produced on-site

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsakas, L., Rova, U., & Christakopoulos, P. (2014). Evaluation of dried sweet sorghum stalks as raw material for methane production. BioMed Research International, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/731731

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

47%

Researcher 13

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

33%

Environmental Science 6

33%

Chemical Engineering 3

17%

Chemistry 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free