Is the Atrium More Important than the Lab? Designer Buildings for New Cultures of Creativity

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Responding to criticism that the pioneers of laboratory studies have neglected the architecture of science labs and have failed to consider the importance of space for scientific practices, a few authors have recently shown an interest in the design and planning process of science buildings. They have convincingly demonstrated the extent to which the power of laboratories depends on sequestrations achieved with walls and doors and have explored how architecture might challenge or compromise the cognitive authority of experimental science (Galison & Thompson, 1999; Gieryn, 1998; Murphy, 2006; Shapin, 1998).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yaneva, A. (2010). Is the Atrium More Important than the Lab? Designer Buildings for New Cultures of Creativity. In Knowledge and Space (Vol. 3, pp. 139–150). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8611-2_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free