The sociopolitical history and physiological underpinnings of skull deformation

21Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this report, the evidence, mechanisms, and rationale for the practice of artificial cranial deformation (ACD) in ancient Peru and during Akhenaten's reign in the 18th dynasty in Egypt (1375-1358 BCE) are reviewed. The authors argue that insufficient attention has been given to the sociopolitical implications of the practice in both regions. While evidence from ancient Peru is widespread and complex, there are comparatively fewer examples of deformed crania from the period of Akhenaten's rule. Nevertheless, Akhenaten's own deformity, the skull of the so-called "Younger Lady" mummy, and Tutankhamen's skull all evince some degree of plagiocephaly, suggesting the need for further research using evidence from depictions of the royal family in reliefs and busts. Following the anthropological review, a neurosurgical focus is directed to instances of plagiocephaly in modern medicine, with special attention to the conditions' etiology, consequences, and treatment. Novel clinical studies on varying modes of treatment will also be studied, together forming a comprehensive review of ACD, both in the past and present.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayer, A., Campbell, A., Appelboom, G., Hwang, B. Y., McDowell, M., Piazza, M., … Anderson, R. C. E. (2010). The sociopolitical history and physiological underpinnings of skull deformation. Neurosurgical Focus, 29(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.FOCUS10202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free