Culture, psychotherapy, and the diasporic self as transitoric identity: A reply to social constructionist and postmodern concepts of narrative psychotherapy

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scientific psychology is part of a cultural practice whose historical roots lie in Europe (Gergen et al. 1996a). Only in the nineteenth century did it begin to take shape as an independent discipline. Its founding fathers soon included outstanding representatives of North American psychology. Psychology and psychotherapy coevolved. The latter was always regarded as applied psychology, which with psychopathology was to provide patients with professionalized social support in treating psychosocial problems. Following Sigmund Freud's influential invention of psychoanalysis, the field differentiated rapidly. New schools, approaches and procedures emerged, without any end in sight as modern psychology and psychotherapy embarked on a rapid career. The twentieth century was often seen as the epoch of psychologization of people - at least in the so-called western world. © 2008 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zielke, B., & Straub, J. (2008). Culture, psychotherapy, and the diasporic self as transitoric identity: A reply to social constructionist and postmodern concepts of narrative psychotherapy. In Meaning in Action: Constructions, Narratives, and Representations (pp. 49–72). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free