Rebiopsy of histological samples in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison among rebiopsy procedures

11Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare successful rate, failure reasons, and complications among procedures of histological rebiopsy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of histologically rebiopsied cases with non-small cell lung cancer. Results: One hundred and eleven histological rebiopsies were performed in: 86 (77%) lung; 11 (10%) lymph node; 5 (5%) pleura; 4 (4%) liver; 2 (2%) muscle; 2 (2%) adrenal gland; and 1 (1%) rib. Successful rate by computed tomography-guided biopsy (CTGB), transbronchial biopsy (TBB), and ultrasound-guided biopsy were 86% (48/56), 90% (28/31), and 100% (24/24), respectively. Reasons for rebiopsy failure by CTGB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=5) and pneumothorax (n=3), and those by TBB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=2) and bleeding (n=1). Severe complications (≥grade 3): One grade 3 pneumothorax and one grade 4 air embolization were observed in two (2%, 2/111) cases receiving CTGB. Conclusion: Rebiopsy of histological samples can be highly successful and feasible by optimal procedural selection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hata, A., Katakami, N., Nanjo, S., Okuda, C., Kaji, R., & Imai, Y. (2017). Rebiopsy of histological samples in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison among rebiopsy procedures. In Vivo, 31(3), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free