Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare successful rate, failure reasons, and complications among procedures of histological rebiopsy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of histologically rebiopsied cases with non-small cell lung cancer. Results: One hundred and eleven histological rebiopsies were performed in: 86 (77%) lung; 11 (10%) lymph node; 5 (5%) pleura; 4 (4%) liver; 2 (2%) muscle; 2 (2%) adrenal gland; and 1 (1%) rib. Successful rate by computed tomography-guided biopsy (CTGB), transbronchial biopsy (TBB), and ultrasound-guided biopsy were 86% (48/56), 90% (28/31), and 100% (24/24), respectively. Reasons for rebiopsy failure by CTGB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=5) and pneumothorax (n=3), and those by TBB were no/insufficient malignant cells (n=2) and bleeding (n=1). Severe complications (≥grade 3): One grade 3 pneumothorax and one grade 4 air embolization were observed in two (2%, 2/111) cases receiving CTGB. Conclusion: Rebiopsy of histological samples can be highly successful and feasible by optimal procedural selection.
CITATION STYLE
Hata, A., Katakami, N., Nanjo, S., Okuda, C., Kaji, R., & Imai, Y. (2017). Rebiopsy of histological samples in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison among rebiopsy procedures. In Vivo, 31(3), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11086
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.