The validity of the neutral theory of molecular evolution, which holds that almost all allelic substitution during evolution has been due to random genetic drift, is a pivotal question in evolutionary biology. Here it is shown that the theory predicts a 1:1 ratio among isozymes in a species between those which are faster (i.e. have greater anodal mobilities) and those which are slower (i.e. have lesser anodal mobilities) than their homologues in a related species. In fact, observed patterns of isozymic variation display deviations from such a ratio. Significant departures from expected values were found for reptiles, fish and insects. A near significant result was seen for amphibia. The overall deviations are highly significant. The results strongly suggest that a substantial fraction of allozymic substitution has been due to positive Darwinian selection. © 1992 The Genetical Society of Great Britain.
CITATION STYLE
Colgan, D. J. (1992). Interspecific isozymic substitution is not random. Heredity, 69(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.108
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.