Figural goodness and the predictability of figural elements

10Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

All 126 patterns composed of five dots distributed over the cells of a 3 by 3 matrix were examined for the predictability of their elements. The predictability of a given dot in a given pattern was measured as the percentage of Ss who indicated that dot as one "implied or suggested" by the subpattern composed of the remaining four dots of the pattern. The dots comprising a figurally good five-dot pattern were generally more predictable, one from the others, than the dots comprising a poor pattern. This finding accords with the Gestaltist conception of a good figure as one whose elements are well organized, and it is the state of affairs required by Garner's hypothesis that better figures are perceived to have fewer alternatives than poorer figures. A mechanism mediating the prediction of an element of a pattern from the other elements was suggested. © 1973 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Some informational aspects of visual perception

1989Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Abstraction and The Process of Recognition

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The regular-random numerosity illusion: Rectangular patterns

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pattern goodness and speed of encoding

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Symmetry, complexity and perceptual economy: Effects of minimum and maximum simplicity conditions

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bear, G. (1973). Figural goodness and the predictability of figural elements. Perception & Psychophysics, 13(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207231

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘14‘16‘1800.250.50.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

80%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0