Myths, beliefs and superstitions about the quality of software and of its teaching

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is a surprise to see how, as years go by, two activities so germane to our discipline, (1) the creation of quality software, and (2) the quality teaching of software construction, and more generally of Computer Science, are surrounded or covered, little by little, by beliefs, attitudes, "schools of thought," superstitions and fetishes rarely seen in a scientific endeavor. Each day, more people question them less frequently, so that they become "everyday truths" or "standards to observe and demand." I have the feeling that I am minority in this wave of believers and beliefs, and that my viewpoints are highly unpopular. I dare to express them because I fail to see enough faults in my reasoning and reasons, and because perhaps there exist other "believers" not so convinced about these viewpoints, so that, perhaps, we will discover that "the imperator had no clothes, he was naked." © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arenas, A. G. (2004). Myths, beliefs and superstitions about the quality of software and of its teaching. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3061, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25958-9_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free