Short-course regimens of rifapentine plus isoniazid to treat latent tuberculosis infection in older Chinese patients: A randomised controlled study

59Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) management is now a critical component of the World Health Organization's End TB Strategy. In this randomised controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier ChiCTR-IOR-15007202), two short-course regimens with rifapentine plus isoniazid (a 3-month once-weekly regimen and a 2-month twice-weekly regimen) were initially designed to be evaluated for rural residents aged 50-69 years with LTBI in China. Due to the increasingly rapid growth and unexpected high frequency of adverse effects, the treatments were terminated early (after 8 weeks for the once-weekly regimen and after 6 weeks for the twice-weekly regimen). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis on the completed doses, the cumulative rate of active disease during 2 years of follow-up was 1.21% (14 out of 1155) in the untreated controls, 0.78% (10 out of 1284) in the group that received the 8-week once-weekly regimen and 0.46% (six out of 1299) in the group that received the 6-week twice-weekly regimen. The risk of active disease was decreased, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI 0.27-1.43) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.15-1.09) for the treatments, respectively. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of hepatotoxicity (1.02% (13 out of 1279) versus 1.17% (15 out of 1279); p=0.704). The short regimens tested must be used with caution among the elderly because of the high rates of adverse effects. Further work is necessary to test the ultrashort regimens in younger people with LTBI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, L., Zhang, H., Xin, H., Liu, J., Pan, S., Li, X., … Jin, Q. (2018). Short-course regimens of rifapentine plus isoniazid to treat latent tuberculosis infection in older Chinese patients: A randomised controlled study. European Respiratory Journal, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01470-2018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free