Handling conflicts in aspect-oriented requirements engineering

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Identification and resolution of aspectual conflicts should be handled at the requirements level, before major design decisions are made. Treating conflicting situations this early facilitates negotiation among stakeholders. The Aspect-Oriented Requirements Analysis (AORA) approach offers HAM (Hybrid Assessment Method), a technique for the resolution of conflicts between concerns that contribute negatively to each other and have the same importance. HAM uses a multi-criteria decision method to support the resolution of these conflicts and extends this treatment to conflicts between concerns triggered by stakeholders with contradictory interests on a set of concerns. An example taken from the Crisis Management System case study is used to illustrate HAM's potential support for treating concerns during composition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brito, I. S., Moreira, A., Ribeiro, R. A., & Araújo, J. (2013). Handling conflicts in aspect-oriented requirements engineering. In Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering (Vol. 9783642386404, pp. 225–241). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38640-4_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free