Long term efficacy of minimal incision osteotomy for hallux abducto valgus.

15Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To observe and evaluate the long-term results of minimal incision osteotomy for hallux abducto valgus. From February 1995 to May 1999, 372 cases (705 feet) with hallux abducto valgus were treated with minimal incision osteotomy. Seventy-nine patients (150 feet) were followed up for more than five years (mean 7.5; range, 5.3-13.2 years) after surgery. The preoperative and postoperative hallux abducto valgus angles (HVA), intermetatarsal angles (IMA), tibial sesamoid position (TSP), American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, range of movement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and lateral metatarsalgia were observed, measured and evaluated. Based on clinic curative effect evaluation criterion, 56 feet (37.3%) were excellent, 88 feet (58.7%) good, 6 feet (4.0%) fair. The postoperative mean AOFAS score was 84.20 ± 4.32 points. The mean HVA decreased from 33.28° to 12.31° and the mean IMA1-2 from 11.75° to 6.80°. The TSP was corrected from an average preoperative grade of 4.29 to a grade of 3.07 by final follow-up. There was no nonunion or delayed union, no avascular necrosis, no infection, and no hallux varus. Numbness in the big toe was found in 4 feet (2.7%). The range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint decreased from 70.20° to 69.53°. Of 97 feet (64.7%) with pre-operative 2-5 metatarsalgia, this had disappeared in 35 feet, improved in 54 feet and was aggravated in 8 feet postoperatively. Minimal incision osteotomy is a simple and reliable technique for treating hallux abducto valgus with minimal complications. © 2010 Tianjin Hospital and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, W. dong, Wen, J. min, Hu, H. wei, Sun, Y. sheng, Sang, Z. cheng, Jiang, K. wei, … Dai, H. ling. (2010). Long term efficacy of minimal incision osteotomy for hallux abducto valgus. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00091.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free