Does capitalism need the state system?

115Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contemporary Marxist students of international relations, like their mainstream counterparts, disagree over whether geopolitics has a future. Many believe that it has none, either because globalized capitalism has overcome the nation-state or because the ‘informal empire’ of the United States has overridden inter-state conflict. This article supports those who argue that significant economic and political conflicts persist among the main capitalist states. It does so by exploring the question of whether, in Marxist theory, the capitalist economic system and the international system of states are necessarily or contingently related. Marx's method in Capital offers, it is argued, a way of non-reductively incorporating the state system within the capitalist mode of production. This argument provides the basis for a partial reconciliation of Marxism and realism. More importantly, it offers a theoretical framework in which to explore the scope for inter-state conflict in the 21st century. © 2007, Centre of International Studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callinicos, A. (2007). Does capitalism need the state system? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701680464

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free