Acceptable variability in external quality assessment programmes for basic semen analysis

24Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: External quality assessment is essential in modern andrology laboratories. To assess the proficiency of laboratories participating in an external quality assessment programme (EQAP), limits for acceptable variability must be determined. Limits currently specified largely depend on criteria set by the organizers of individual EQAP schemes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the different criteria described in ISO 13528: 2005 for calculating acceptable variability in EQAP when applied to basic semen analysis parameters. METHODS: AND RESULTSThe data used in this study were the means and standard deviations obtained for independent samples from two EQAPs, one national (Spanish) and one international (European). The acceptable variability according to ISO 13528: 2005 was calculated using four types of criteria: (i) ±3 standard deviations of the results of all participating laboratories; (ii) ±3 standard deviations of the results of expert laboratories; (iii) quality specifications based on biological variability, state-of-the-art and clinicians' opinions and (iv) the same quality specifications adjusted for the uncertainty of the assigned value. The first two strategies resulted in very wide ranges of acceptable variability. Conversely, the strategy based only on quality specifications resulted in very narrow ranges. For the fourth strategy, acceptable ranges were intermediate between the results produced with the other strategies. The third and fourth strategies did not produce observable differences in acceptable ranges when the model used for calculating the specifications of analytical quality was changed. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential that EQAPs for semen parameters should determine the ranges for acceptable variability in results. Moreover, these ranges must be clinically useful, i.e. the variability should have a minimal negative impact on clinical decisions. The exact definition of 'expert laboratory' is more important than the model chosen for estimating analytical quality specifications in an EQAP for semen parameters in basic semen analysis. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A practical guide to basic laboratory andrology

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The future of computer-aided sperm analysis

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'How to count sperm properly': Checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palacios, E. R., Clavero, A., Gonzalvo, M. C., Rosales, A., Mozas, J., Martínez, L., … Castilla, J. A. (2012). Acceptable variability in external quality assessment programmes for basic semen analysis. Human Reproduction, 27(2), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der413

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Researcher 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

44%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

25%

Engineering 3

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free