Variation in intravenous iron use internationally and over time: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

86Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BackgroundTo examine patterns of intravenous (IV) iron use across 12 countries from 1999 to 2011.MethodsTrends in iron use are described among 32 192 hemodialysis (HD) patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Adjusted associations of IV iron dose with serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) values were also studied.ResultsIV iron was administered to 50% of patients over 4 months in 1999, increasing to 71% during 2009-11, with increasing use in most countries. Among patients receiving IV iron, the mean monthly dose increased from 232 ± 167 to 281 ± 211 mg. Most countries used 3 to 4 doses/month, but Canada used about 2 doses/month, Italy increased from 3 to almost 6 doses/month and Germany used 5 to 6 doses/month. The USA and most European countries predominantly used iron sucrose and sodium ferric gluconate. A significant use of iron dextran was limited to Canada and France; iron polymaltose was used in Australia and New Zealand; and Japan used ferric oxide saccharate, chondroitin polysulfate iron complex and cideferron. Ferritin values rose in most countries: 22% of patients had ≥800 ng/mL in the recent years of study. TSAT levels increased to a lesser degree over time. Japan had much lower IV iron dosing and ferritin levels, but similar TSAT levels. In adjusted analyses, serum ferritin and TSAT levels increased signifcantly by 14 ng/mL and 0.16%, respectively, for every 100 mg/month higher mean monthly iron dose.ConclusionsIV iron prescription patterns varied between countries and changed over time from 1999 to 2011. IV iron use and dose increased in most countries, with notable increases in ferritin but not TSAT levels. With rising cumulative IV iron doses, studies of the effects of changing IV iron dosing and other anemia management practices on clinical outcomes should be a high priority. © 2013 The Author.

References Powered by Scopus

Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models

14759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease

2475Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin

1992Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Iron-deficiency anemia

1085Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intravenous iron in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Iron management in chronic kidney disease: Conclusions from a "kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailie, G. R., Larkina, M., Goodkin, D. A., Li, Y., Pisoni, R. L., Bieber, B., … Robinson, B. M. (2013). Variation in intravenous iron use internationally and over time: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 28(10), 2570–2579. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft062

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 15

48%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 33

80%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free