Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: Effects on postoperative analgesia

Abstract

Background: The benefit of laparoscopy to patients has been clearly established in adults undergoing cholecystectomy. Results are less clear for appendectomy. The current study was undertaken to compare the respective 3- day postoperative periods after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. Methods: Sixty-three children (aged 8-15 yr) scheduled for appendectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: open and laparoscopic. Postoperative evaluation included delay of postoperative recovery (walking and feeding), pain assessment by visual analog scale during the 3 subsequent days, amount of nalbuphine administered via a patient-controlled analgesia system during the first 48 h and responses by children, parents, and nurses on the overall quality of analgesia. Results: There was no difference between groups for demographic data (particularly macroscopic aspect of appendix), analgesia, sedation, delay before eating and walking, incidence of urinary retention, nausea, vomiting. Operative time was longer (P ≤ 0.05) in the laparoscopic group (54 ± 17 min) than in the open group (39 ± 18 min). Thirty five percent of the children had pain at the shoulder in the LAP group versus ten percent in the open group (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopy did not improve analgesia and postoperative recovery after appendectomy in children.