Safety and security co-engineering and argumentation framework

7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Automotive systems become increasingly complex due to their functional range and data exchange with the outside world. Until now, functional safety of such safety-critical electrical/electronic systems has been covered successfully. However, the data exchange requires interconnection across trusted boundaries of the vehicle. This leads to security issues like hacking and malicious attacks against interfaces, which could bring up new types of safety issues. Before mass-production of automotive systems, arguments supported by evidences are required regarding safety and security. Product engineering must be compliant to specific standards and must support arguments that the system is free of unreasonable risks. This paper shows a safety and security co-engineering framework, which covers standard compliant process derivation and management, and supports product specific safety and security co-analysis. Furthermore, we investigate process- and product-related argumentation and apply the approach to an automotive use case regarding safety and security.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, H., Bramberger, R., Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Gruber, T., Ruiz, A., & Macher, G. (2017). Safety and security co-engineering and argumentation framework. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10489 LNCS, pp. 286–297). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free