Stereotactic body radiation therapy for low- and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Is there a dose effect?

17Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy and toxicity of two stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) dose regimens for treatment of early prostate cancer. Forty-one patients treated with 35 Gy were matched with 41 patients treated with 36.25 Gy. Both patient groups received SBRT in five fractions over five consecutive days using the CyberKnife. Each group had 37 low-risk patients and 4 intermediate-risk patients. No statistically significant differences were present for age, prostate volume, PSA, Gleason score, stage, or risk between the groups. The dose was prescribed to the 83-87% isodose line to cover the prostate and a 5-mm margin all around, except 3 mm posteriorly. The overall median follow-up is 51 months (range, 45-58 months) with a median 54 and 48 months follow-up for the 35 and 36.25-Gy dose groups, respectively. One biochemical failure occurred in each group yielding a 97.5% freedom from biochemical failure. The PSA response has been favorable for all patients with a mean PSA of 0.1 ng/ml at 4-years. Overall toxicity has been mild with 5% late grade 2 rectal toxicity in both dose groups. Late grade 1 urinary toxicity was equivalent between groups; grade 2 urinary toxicity was 5% (2/41 patients) and 10% (4/41 patients) in the 35-Gy and 36.25-Gy dose groups (p = 0.6969), respectively. Overall, the highly favorable PSA response, limited biochemical failures, limited toxicity, and limited impact on quality of life in these low- to low-intermediate-risk patients are supportive of excellent long-term results for CyberKnife delivered SBRT. © 2011 Katz, Santoro, Ashley and Diblasio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, A. J., Santoro, M., Ashley, R., & Diblasio, F. (2011). Stereotactic body radiation therapy for low- and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Is there a dose effect? Frontiers in Oncology, 1(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2011.00049

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free