Adolescent experiences of pregnancy in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

12Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Fertility rates among adolescents have fallen globally, yet the greatest incidence remains in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Gaining insight into adolescents needs and experiences of pregnancy will help identify if context specific services meet their needs and how to optimise pregnancy experiences. A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies considering adolescent experiences of pregnancy in LMICs has not yet been published. Aim: To synthesise available qualitative evidence to provide greater understanding of the needs and experiences of adolescents who become pregnant in low-and middle-income countries. Methods: An extensive search utilised six databases and citations searching. Studies were included if they were of a qualitative or mixed methods design. Participants lived in LMICs and were adolescents who were pregnant, had experienced pregnancy during adolescence or were an adolescent male partner. Relevant studies were assessed for quality to determine suitability for inclusion. A meta-ethnography approach was used to generate themes and a final line of argument. Results: After screening and quality assessment 21 studies were included. The meta-ethnography generated four themes, A wealth of emotions, I am not ready, Impactful relationships and Respectful and disrespectful care. Unplanned, unwanted and unacceptable pregnancies were a source of shame, with subsequent challenging personal relationships and frequently a lack of needed support. Even when pregnancy was wanted, adolescents faced the internal conflict of their desires not always aligning with socio-cultural, religious and family expectations. Access, utilisation and experiences of care were significantly impacted by adolescents’ relationships with others, the level of respectful care experienced, and engagement with adolescent friendly services. Conclusions: Adolescents who experience pregnancy in LMICs deserve support to meet their personal and pregnancy needs; efforts are needed to tailor the support provided. A lack of a health care provider knowledge and skills is an obstacle to optimal support, with more and better training integral to increasing the availability of adolescent friendly and respectful care. Adolescents should be involved in the planning of health care services and supported to make decisions about their care. The diversity across countries mean policy makers and other stakeholders need to consider how these implications can be realised in each context.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing

2303Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

2240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The magnitude of teenage pregnancy and its associated factors among teenagers in Dodoma Tanzania: a community-based analytical cross-sectional study

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interventions to prevent unintended pregnancies among adolescents: a rapid overview of systematic reviews

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Explore the lived childbirth experiences, challenges following childbirth, and coping strategies of teenage mothers: A qualitative meta-synthesis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crooks, R., Bedwell, C., & Lavender, T. (2022). Adolescent experiences of pregnancy in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05022-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

68%

Researcher 7

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 28

53%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

26%

Social Sciences 7

13%

Arts and Humanities 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free