Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer

304Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the determination of HER-2/neu status of breast cancers. Materials and Methods: FISH and IHC for HER-2/neu were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin sections of 100 consecutive invasive breast cancers. FISH was performed at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, using the Oncor/Ventana INFORM kit (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ; formerly said by Oncor, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) in a laboratory certified as proficient in this procedure. IHC was performed at Pheno-Path Laboratories, Seattle, WA, using a polyclonal antibody to the HER-2/neu protein. FISH and IHC were analyzed in a blinded fashion, and the results were then compared. Procedure and interpretation times and reagent costs for FISH and IHC were also compared. Results: HER-2/neu was amplified by FISH in 26% of cases, and 23% were HER-2/neu-positive by IHC. FISH and IHC were both assessable in 90 cases. Concordance between FISH and IHC results was seen in 82 of these cases (91%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacobs, T. W., Gown, A. M., Yaziji, H., Barnes, M. J., & Schnitt, S. J. (1999). Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(7), 1974–1982. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.7.1974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free