Variation in the use of MRI for cervical spine clearance: An opportunity to simultaneously improve clinical care and decrease cost

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background For years, controversy has existed about the ideal approach for cervical spine clearance in obtunded, blunt trauma patients. However, recent national guidelines suggest that MRI is not necessary for collar clearance in these patients. The purpose of this study was to identify the extent of national variation in the use of MRI and assess patient-specific and hospital-specific factors associated with the practice. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2012. We included blunt trauma patients aged ≥18 years, admitted to level 1 or 2 trauma centers (TCs), with a Glasgow Coma Scale <8, Abbreviated Injury Scale >3 for the head and mechanically ventilated for more than 72 hours. Multilevel modeling was used to identify patient-level and hospital-level factors associated with spine MRI use. Results 32 125 obtunded, blunt trauma patients treated at 395 unique TCs met our inclusion criteria. The mean proportion of patients who received MRI over the entire sample was 9.9%. The proportions of patients at each hospital who received a spine MRI ranged from 0.5% to 68.7%. Younger patients, with injuries from motor vehicle collisions and pedestrian injuries, were more likely to receive MRI. When controlling for other variables, Injury Severity Score (ISS) was not associated with MRI use. Hospitals in the Northeast, level 1 TCs and non-teaching hospitals were more likely to obtain MRIs in this patient population. Conclusion After controlling for patient-level characteristics, variation remained in MRI use based on geography, trauma center level and teaching status. This evidence suggests that current national guidelines limiting the use of MRI for cervical spine evaluation following blunt trauma are not being followed consistently. This may be due to physicians not being up to date with best practice care, unavailability of locally adopted protocols in institutions or lack of consensus among clinical providers.

References Powered by Scopus

Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: Update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee

244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Secondary insults during intrahospital transport of head-injured patients

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Choosing wisely - The politics and economics of labeling low-value services

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dissemination, implementation, and de-implementation: The trauma perspective

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Socioeconomic and Psychosocial Predictors of Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Cervical and Thoracic Spine Trauma in the United States

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utilization of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of traumatic C-Spine injuries at a level 1 trauma center: A retrospective Cohort analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Albaghdadi, A., Leeds, I. L., Florecki, K. L., Canner, J. K., Schneider, E. B., Sakran, J. V., & Haut, E. R. (2019). Variation in the use of MRI for cervical spine clearance: An opportunity to simultaneously improve clinical care and decrease cost. Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2019-000336

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 4

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

38%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Arts and Humanities 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free