Digital anthropology is not ethnography: Cybernetic explanation and transdisciplinarity

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article transposes to digital anthropology Tim Ingold’s polemical argument that “anthropology is not ethnography,” reclaiming the discipline’s transdisciplinary, four fields vocation from the perspective Gregory Bateson called cybernetic explanation. It illustrates the potential of this approach by exploring how notions from classical anthropological theory may shed productive light on some of the anti-structural – unintended yet systemic – effects of platformization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cesarino, L. (2021). Digital anthropology is not ethnography: Cybernetic explanation and transdisciplinarity. Civitas, 21(2), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39872

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free