Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation

120Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two planning system models currently cohabit in Europe: a more traditional and widespread one, aspiring to 'conform' single projects to a collective strategy; and a different and less institutionalised one, promoting those projects capable of 'performing' a collective strategy. Historical and cultural reasons may explain the major diffusion and persistence of the former, but current needs of territorial governance lead to consider the latter as preferable. This is especially so in the light of the EU integration process, such cohabitation is no longer bearable and conforming ambitions should be definitively abandoned.

References Powered by Scopus

URBAN REGIMES AND THE CAPACITY TO GOVERN: A Political Economy Approach

841Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

URBAN COMPLEXITY AND SPATIAL STRATEGIES: TOWARDS A RELATIONAL PLANNING FOR OUR TIMES

709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined

608Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

European spatial planning and territorial cooperation

297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rivolin, U. J. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice and Research, 23(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

74%

Researcher 8

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 29

49%

Environmental Science 18

31%

Engineering 7

12%

Design 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free