A worldwide survey on the use of animal-derived materials and reagents in scientific experimentation

19Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of cell and tissue-based methods in basic, applied and regulatory science has been increasing exponentially. Animal-derived components, including serum, coating materials, growth factors and antibodies are routinely used in cell/tissue cultures and in general laboratory practices. In addition to ethical issues, the use and production of animal-derived materials and reagents raises many scientific concerns, generally associated with presence of undefined components and batch-to-batch variability, which may compromise experimental reproducibility. On the other hand, non-animal materials and reagents, such as human cells, alternatives to animal sera or non-animal recombinant antibodies, are becoming increasingly available, and their use is encouraged by the EU Directive 2010/63 and the Guidance Document on Good In vitro Method Practices (GIVIMP), published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In an effort to map the current state of use of animal-derived reagents across different sectors and to identify the obstacles possibly hampering the implementation of non-animal derived alternatives, a global online survey addressed to scientists working on in vivo, in vitro, in silico methods, in academia as well as pharmaceutical or cosmetic companies, was conducted with the goal to understand: 1) the most commonly used animal-derived materials and reagents, 2) the main issues associated with the production and use of animal-derived materials and reagents, 3) the current level of knowledge on available non-animal alternative materials and reagents, and 4) what educational and information sources could be most useful or impactful to disseminate knowledge on non-animal alternatives. This paper provides an overview of the survey replies and discusses possible proposals to increase awareness, acceptance and use of non-animal ingredients.

References Powered by Scopus

Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy

0
779Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel

601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimization of chemically defined cell culture media - Replacing fetal bovine serum in mammalian in vitro methods

479Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new animal product free defined medium for 2D and 3D culturing of normal and cancer cells to study cell proliferation and migration as well as dose response to chemical treatment

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Engagement of Scientists with the Public and Policymakers to Promote Alternative Methods

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Case Studies Exemplifying the Transition to Animal Component-free Cell Culture

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cassotta, M., Bartnicka, J. J., Pistollato, F., Parvatam, S., Weber, T., D’Alessandro, V., … Coecke, S. (2022). A worldwide survey on the use of animal-derived materials and reagents in scientific experimentation. Engineering in Life Sciences, 22(9), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100167

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

43%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

21%

Engineering 3

21%

Chemical Engineering 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free