Adolescents' non-core food intake: A description of what, where and with whom adolescents consume non-core foods

29Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Little is known about adolescents' non-core food intake in the UK and the eating context in which they consume non-core foods. The present study aimed to describe types of non-core foods consumed by British adolescents in total and across different eating contexts. Design A descriptive analysis, using cross-sectional data from food diaries. Non-core foods were classified based on cut-off points of fat and sugar from the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Eating context was defined as 'where' and 'with whom' adolescents consumed each food. Percentages of non-core energy were calculated for each food group in total and across eating contexts. A combined ranking was then created to account for each food's contribution to non-core energy intake and its popularity of consumption (percentage of consumers). Setting The UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008-2011. Subjects Adolescents across the UK aged 11-18 years (n 666). Results Non-core food comprised 39·5 % of total energy intake and was mostly 'Regular soft drinks', 'Crisps & savoury snacks', 'Chips & potato products', 'Chocolate' and 'Biscuits'. Adolescents ate 57·0 % and 51·3 % of non-core food at 'Eateries' or with 'Friends', compared with 33·2 % and 32·1 % at 'Home' or with 'Parents'. Persistent foods consumed across eating contexts were 'Regular soft drinks' and 'Chips & potato products'. Conclusions Regular soft drinks contribute the most energy and are the most popular non-core food consumed by adolescents regardless of context, and represent a good target for interventions to reduce non-core food consumption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toumpakari, Z., Haase, A. M., & Johnson, L. (2016). Adolescents’ non-core food intake: A description of what, where and with whom adolescents consume non-core foods. Public Health Nutrition, 19(9), 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016000124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free