Alternative low frequency magnetic field theranostics: Recent advances, safety and hazards

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The paper presents a brief review and comparative analysis of low frequency (nonheating) and radio-frequency electromagnetic nanomedicine technologies. The former are shown to have a considerable advantage over the latter ones: a higher flexibility and penetrating ability, easier to dose and control, easier to localize, as well as safer and less costly. This makes their employment promising for building a new technological platform for low frequency magnetic theranostics with a wider range of options, i.e. possessing a wider multimodality than traditional radio-frequency methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Golovin, Y., Klyachko, N., Majouga, A., Golovin, D., & Gribanovsky, S. (2015). Alternative low frequency magnetic field theranostics: Recent advances, safety and hazards. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 98). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/98/1/012016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free