The paper presents a brief review and comparative analysis of low frequency (nonheating) and radio-frequency electromagnetic nanomedicine technologies. The former are shown to have a considerable advantage over the latter ones: a higher flexibility and penetrating ability, easier to dose and control, easier to localize, as well as safer and less costly. This makes their employment promising for building a new technological platform for low frequency magnetic theranostics with a wider range of options, i.e. possessing a wider multimodality than traditional radio-frequency methods.
CITATION STYLE
Golovin, Y., Klyachko, N., Majouga, A., Golovin, D., & Gribanovsky, S. (2015). Alternative low frequency magnetic field theranostics: Recent advances, safety and hazards. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 98). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/98/1/012016
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.