Subjective relevance: Implications on digital libraries for experts and novices

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditional information retrieval (IR) systems are developed based on the "best match" principle which assumes that users can specify their needs in a query and documents retrieved are relevant to users. However, this objective measure of relevance is limited as it does not consider differences in experts' and novices' knowledge and context. This paper presents initial work towards addressing this limitation by investigating subjective relevance (that can include topical, pertinence, situational, and motivational relevance) features that can be incorporated into digital library interfaces to help experts and novices search and judge relevance more effectively. A pilot study was conducted to elicit initial subjective relevance features from experts and novices. The paper concludes with a discussion of elicited design features and their implications for user-centered digital libraries. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S. S., Theng, Y. L., Goh, D. H. L., & Foo, S. S. B. (2004). Subjective relevance: Implications on digital libraries for experts and novices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3334, 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30544-6_50

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free